On February 5, 2020, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) issued its 12-month finding on the petition to list summer-run steelhead in Northern California (Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus) as endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), concluding that listing is not warranted because the summer-run steelhead does not qualify as a distinct population segment of the Northern California steelhead. Despite the negative finding, the summer-run steelhead is still protected under the ESA. How is that possible, you ask?

Simple, I say. The summer-run and winter-run steelhead are already included within the Northern California steelhead distinct population segment, which has been listed as a threatened species for more than a decade. But why the listing petition, you ask? I can only speculate as to the motivations of the petitioning party, the Friends of the Eel River. (See their press release herehere.) However, I can tell you that listing a more limited distinct population segment as endangered generally means increased protection under the ESA – both because of the heightened listing (threatened versus endangered) and the smaller population size.

In the 12-month finding, NMFS found that the “best available data indicate that summer-run steelhead cannot be listed as a separate [distinct population segment] from winter-run steelhead, as the two groups maintain an ongoing and interconnected genetic legacy.” The Northern California steelhead distinct population segment extends from Redwood Creek (Humboldt County) in the north, southward to, but not including, the Russian River.

Source: Lexology


John Stewart
Editor, OutdoorWire.com
Vice President, BlueRibbon Coalition